border border border
border
Brigatti On-line - http://www.brigatti.co.uk
border border
HomeNewsWeblinksContact Us Friday, 28 April 2017    
 
    arrow       Home


Main Menu
 Home
 Tribute to our Father
 Site News
 Web Links
 Personal Sites
 University Sites
 Client Sites
 CV | Résumé
 Contact Us
 Brigatti Forums
 Brigatti Blog
 Brigatti Singapore Blog
 My New Life in Singapore
 Brigatti Gallery
 Community
 Recommend Site
 Site Map
 - - - - - - -
 Administrator

LinkedIn
View Aaron Brigatti's profile on LinkedIn

FaceBook
Facebook Profile

Login Form
Username

Password

Remember me
Forgotten your password?

Who's Online
We have 42 guests online

Online Users
No Users Online

Hit Counter
5293917 Visitors
(Since Aug 2004)

Google Adsense

Brigatti Cloud

actually   although   another   anyway   around   being   bonnet   brigatti   certainly   clio   couple   days   decided   didn   flight   friday   going   greek   having   holiday   hotel   into   issue   maintenance   managed   mechanism   nice   not   opportunity   really   renault   safety   service   simply   site   something   vosa   wanted   weeks   without   years  


Did you know?
The Moon orbits the Earth at an average distance of 236,000 miles.

PayPal Donation
Support Brigatti On-line, by making a small donation:

Answers.com

border
  Print 
Written by Aaron Brigatti  
Saturday, 19 January 2008

In addition to my letter to the Customer Services Department of Renault UK, I wanted to continue my dialogue with the top-cheese of Renault UK - Roland Bouchara - the Managing Director.

I refer to Mr Phelan’s letter dated 28th November 2007 sent on your behalf.

Renault has implied that there are two causes behind Clio bonnets releasing themselves without warning; lack of maintenance and incorrect closure of the bonnet.

Lets go with some implied statements made by your customer service department:

  • Closing a bonnet does not rely on any particular level of maintenance:
    • This implies that lack of maintenance should not prevent a bonnet being closed correctly.
    • We need to understand whether a mechanism with lack of maintenance, can result in the two-catch mechanism to fail to fully apply, even though the bonnet is closed in the prescribed manner outlined in your handbook. Can checking bonnet closures (based on your owner manual guidelines) prove that the secondary catch is applied?
  • Catches do not have to be broken to signify an issue with the mechanisms:
    • Lack of maintenance may cause the bonnet catches, specifically the secondary (what you term ‘safety’) catch, to not engage fully.
  • Secondary catch should be engaged in all cases:
    • We now understand this to not be the case – there is a possibility that only main catch is engaged, without any confirmation that safety it not engaged.

The incident timings are not instantaneous, i.e. they could happen after a period of time (days, weeks); can the technical explanations fit these timelines facts? By communicating to your customer base now, Renault has admitted that the closure or maintenance process creates a risk to the performance of the bonnet catch maintenance. As you have clearly identified “maintenance” as a possible cause, this cannot be used as a rationale behind the cause of my incident, without accepting liability. There were no notices to warn owners published before April/May 2007, or your dealerships until January 2007.

Renault’s report on my vehicle does not indicate that I had not closed the bonnet correctly contrary to the prescribed approach. Nor does the report indicate what could have caused the bonnet to release without warning. It doesn’t confirm whether the secondary catch was engaged at the time of the incident, or that the catch had been engaged, but released itself. Nor does not it identify whether alternative parts that could have used in the manufacturing of the mechanism may have prevented the issue?

If the safety catch was functioning as designed (as noted in your report) – why didn’t it prevent the bonnet releasing itself all the way? This could occur if it was not engaged. There is nothing that has explained this point – the investigation is far from closed.

Could a bonnet be closed without the secondary catch engaging? Can the secondary catch stick? The very possibility identifies that there is a risk caused by the design of the mechanism which could risk injury or death. The current design is not a fool-proof safety mechanism.

Is there a possibility that the secondary catch was not engaged, even though the main catch was?

"Renault Commitment 2009" emphasises quality and reliability, two important factors we can question during the whole bonnet catch safety issue. I would welcome Mr Ghosn’s views on this matter, as he communicated these values, which seemingly contradicts the state of your bonnet safety mechanism on your vehicles.

We'll see what they have to say for themselves!!

Comments

Only registered users can write comments.
Please login or register.

Powered by AkoComment 1.0!


go to top Go To Top go to top

border
Polls
How can Brigatti Online be improved?
More photographs / pictures
More up-to-date news (inc. blog) entries
More interactive functionality
More news of interest
More fun modules
  

BBC.co.uk/news

Symantec

Yahoo! Finance
Yahoo! UK & Ireland Finance - http://uk.finance.yahoo.com
ticker or name


Symbol lookup

Currency Convertor

Convert this amount

of this type of currency

into this type of currency.

Universal Currency Converter service and trade mark under license from xe.com.
Terms of Use


Mail2Web.com
E-mail
Password

Privacy Policy FAQS
Powered by mail2web.com

Most Read
Hi5.com - Request for Your Profile to be added
Masters Graduation Ceremony
A life-threatening near miss with my Renault Clio on 27th March
Swanking New Samsung HD-LCD 40" TV!
Buying my own place!

© Copyright 1995- Aaron Brigatti. ® All Rights Reserved.
Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use.
Page was generated in 0.195603 seconds
powered by mambo OS
border
border border border