border border border
Brigatti On-line -
border border
HomeNewsWeblinksContact Us Friday, 18 January 2019    
    arrow       Home

Main Menu
 Tribute to our Father
 Site News
 Web Links
 Personal Sites
 University Sites
 Client Sites
 CV | Résumé
 Contact Us
 Brigatti Forums
 Brigatti Blog
 Brigatti Singapore Blog
 My New Life in Singapore
 Brigatti Gallery
 Recommend Site
 Site Map
 - - - - - - -

View Aaron Brigatti's profile on LinkedIn

My Profile on Facebook

Login Form


Remember me
Forgotten your password?

Who's Online
We have 59 guests online

Online Users
No Users Online

Hit Counter
5790868 Visitors
(Since Aug 2004)

Google Adsense

Brigatti Cloud

actually   although   another   anyway   around   being   bonnet   brigatti   certainly   clio   couple   days   decided   didn   flight   friday   going   greek   having   holiday   hotel   into   issue   maintenance   managed   mechanism   nice   not   opportunity   really   renault   safety   service   simply   site   something   vosa   wanted   weeks   without   years  

Did you know?
The Arabs were the first, not only to cultivate coffee but also to begin its trade. By the fifteenth century, coffee was being grown in the Yemeni district of Arabia and by the sixteenth century it was known in Persia, Egypt, Syria and Turkey.

PayPal Donation
Support Brigatti On-line, by making a small donation:

Written by Aaron Brigatti  
Tuesday, 30 March 2010

Well after my mid-March forwarded note to Lord Adonis and Mr Clark from the DoT, I received a bog-standard response from VOSA.

I decided t reply to this, having just discovered that VOSA has a new CEO.  Stephen Tetlow seemed to have been moved aside to another DoT division, and Alastair Peoples has appeared on the scene taking over the CEO-realms of VOSA.  What more of an opportunity do i need to start letter writing again to these motley folks!

"I have been in contact with your predecessor, Mr Tetlow, and you colleagues since 2006 after a life-threatening incident affected my Renault Clio Mark-2, and the infamous Bonnet Catch Failure, which continues to exist in the UK market place.  Following an email addressed to the DoT Cabinet members, Lord Adonis and Mr Clark your office has responded.  I must admit I was quite expecting the standard denial by VOSA, but it was still quite a disappointing response to receive this in any case.

According to your Code of Practice, a “Safety Defect is a feature of design or construction liable to cause significant risk of personal injury or death”.   I am still confused how the Clio-2 Bonnet safety risks are not classed as defects, as your recall databases has bonnet catch failures from Mitsubishu L200, Audi 100, Leyland DAF 200, Peugeot 406/308, Renault 19 (Phase 2), Vauxhall Frontera, Mercedez-Benz C202, Mazda MX6/626 and Alfa Romeo 156/147 – all of which had issues the functionality of the bonnet catch mechanism and were deemed a safety defect and required a formal Recall under the UK VOSA Recall / EU RAPEX system.  Some of these required maintenance intervention, others required replaced parts/mechanisms – irrespective, defects were determined and recalls issued responsibly.

The formal process of notifying users of a safety risk is the VOSA Recall system and not, as you seem to imply, sending a courtesy advisory notification “inviting” owners to visit their dealership.  As you will know this contravenes your own guidelines for safety risks.

I do not agree that you and Renault have done enough.  You all keep referencing a Report which was written without any independent technical experts inputs.  Your own staff confirmed that you didn’t have the skill to complete such an investigation, so relied on Renault to supply the engineers / report inputs.   I am not sure of your internal processes, but this doesn’t appear that transparent or impartial to me, and really seems to imply we have a broken process within VOSA on how you investigate safety issues.  I am looking for the impartial VOSA evidence that no defect exists?  I have not seen this as of today, which VOSA repeatedly seem to reference exists.  You need to proof a defect doesn’t exist, not the other way around.  If there is insufficient proof, a precautionary recall should be issued without question.

“Maintenance” is being used in the wrong context; the parts were designed and manufactured as maintenance-free (where does maintenance fit in as the prevention?).  I understand that they are no longer maintenance-free (confirmed from VOSA/Renault).  This means that they have changed from the original design and construction specifications laid out by the manufacture – and as such, implies that a defect is evident in the bonnet catch specification.  There is no evidence to the contrary.  If corrosion is the root-cause behind my particular incident, then this is not owner-error (nothing to do with how I closed the bonnet) and should be nothing to do with maintenance (as this was not mandated prior to the incident); meaning the mechanism was at a safety risk at the time of my incident.  The only supporting statement is that a safety defect was present in the mechanism at the time of my incident. 

There is only one acceptable approach by VOSA to enforce a full and formal recall for the Renault Clio-2 model within the UK and Globally, and the mechanisms are replaced with a more robust mechanism (design / construction).

This is the responsible attitude I am expecting and nothing less.  I am hopeful that VOSA are in agreement with this approach as the only way to stop these risk incidents re-occurring.  Your current approach is simply not working, and it is not too late to resolve this safety risk and defect.  VOSAs and Renaults inactions are simply not honourable or responsible and put both organisations into disrepute.  I still do not know why we are still talking about this, we should be talking about an aligned resolution strategy and the required actions that Renault would need to be undertake to mitigate a defect that causes significant risk of personal injury or death.

Please do the honourably thing and work with Renault-Nissan group to fully resolve accordingly?  You should enforce the policies which you are responsible for."

Lets see what response I get from this - no expecting much movement, 'cos that would be asking a bit much.  I send this note directly to Alastair Peoples, and copied in the ministers of Lord Adonis and Paul Clark!


Only registered users can write comments.
Please login or register.

Powered by AkoComment 1.0!

go to top Go To Top go to top

How can Brigatti Online be improved?
More photographs / pictures
More up-to-date news (inc. blog) entries
More interactive functionality
More news of interest
More fun modules

Yahoo! Finance
Yahoo! UK & Ireland Finance -
ticker or name

Symbol lookup

Currency Convertor

Convert this amount

of this type of currency

into this type of currency.

Universal Currency Converter service and trade mark under license from
Terms of Use

Privacy Policy FAQS
Powered by

Most Read - Request for Your Profile to be added
Masters Graduation Ceremony
A life-threatening near miss with my Renault Clio on 27th March
Swanking New Samsung HD-LCD 40" TV!
Buying my own place!

© Copyright 1995- Aaron Brigatti. ® All Rights Reserved.
Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use.
Page was generated in 0.335026 seconds
powered by mambo OS
border border border